Chief Justice Rejects Presidential Office Demand to Renominate Justice

Jo Says Request Lacks Specific Grounds or Constitutional Basis Clash Over Supreme Court Seat Resumes After 25 Days

Society|
|
By Kim Seong-tae and Jeon Hee-yoonkim@sedaily.com, heeyoun@sedaily.com
||
President Lee Jae-myung attends a meeting with senior secretaries hosted by the president at Cheong Wa Dae on Nov. 21 (left photo). Supreme Court Chief Justice Jo Hee-de arrives for work at the Supreme Court building on Nov. 22. Chief Justice Jo has refused President Lee's request to renominate a Supreme Court justice candidate, putting the president and the judiciary on a collision course. Kwon Wook / Newsis1 - Seoul Economic Daily Society News from South Korea
President Lee Jae-myung attends a meeting with senior secretaries hosted by the president at Cheong Wa Dae on Nov. 21 (left photo). Supreme Court Chief Justice Jo Hee-de arrives for work at the Supreme Court building on Nov. 22. Chief Justice Jo has refused President Lee's request to renominate a Supreme Court justice candidate, putting the president and the judiciary on a collision course. Kwon Wook / Newsis1

Supreme Court Chief Justice Jo Hee-de on the 22nd formally rejected the presidential office's request to renominate a candidate for the Supreme Court, effectively standing by his original pick. The move came 25 days after the presidential office on Aug. 28 returned his nomination of Son Bong-gi as a Supreme Court justice and asked him to submit a new candidate.

"The only document related to this matter is a 'request for renomination of a Supreme Court justice candidate,' and it contains neither the specific reasons for the request nor its constitutional basis," Jo told reporters. "Nor can I find any other specific constitutional grounds or reasons that would justify the request." He indicated he could not comply because the presidential office had not presented concrete reasons or a constitutional basis for its demand.

The presidential office expressed strong regret over Jo's position. "The chief justice's statement asserts that his power to nominate takes precedence over the president's power to appoint," an official at the presidential office said, calling it "a view that violates the Constitution of the Republic of Korea." The official added that the stance "neutralizes the appointment power of a president elected by the people," and urged the chief justice to "face the fact that a prolonged vacancy on the Supreme Court ultimately harms the public."

With the dispute between the presidential office and the Supreme Court over the nomination escalating into a direct confrontation, the vacancy on the top court is expected to drag on.

Original reporting by Kim Seong-tae and Jeon Hee-yoon for Seoul Economic Daily.

AI-translated from Korean. Quotes from foreign sources are based on Korean-language reports and may not reflect exact original wording.

Watch · Seoul Economic Daily

More →
2:02
World News Day 2026 — Know the facts. Understand what matters. #ChooseTrustedJournalism

AI KEY

Preview
Korean Corporate Intelligence HubKOSPI · KOSDAQ · 12 sectors

A live, cap-weighted view of every KOSPI and KOSDAQ sector, with same-day Korean reporting distilled by company — built for foreign investors, correspondents and analysts who need to scan Korea before the next session.

Korea Company Atlas

Preview
Market Ontology · The Feedback LoopKFTC 2025 · 92 groups · 121,954 articles

An English ontology of the Korean market — how companies, the media, the government and the National Assembly move each other in a loop. Korea's named controlling persons and designated business groups are a mechanism, not a risk to be priced blind.

SIGNAL

Now live
English Edition · Capital MarketsM&A · IPO · PE · Fund Flows

SIGNAL English Edition is live — Korea's deal desk reporting in English. M&A, IPOs, private equity and fund flows, covered daily for global institutional investors. Browse free; subscriber-only scoops at the 50% intro rate.